I am beginning to use individualist vs collectivist thinking to define people’s political leanings. n many occasions someone that is in general a collectivist will use an individual’s issue to impose something on the group.
This sometimes throws me off.
I continually remind myself to expect inconsistency from certain sources and focus on what their intended goals are.
Is there a difference with someone who is consistently inconsistent or inconsistently consistent? Almost always does the unexpected vs hardly ever does the expected?
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.-Ayn Rand
somewhere Micheal Bay is crying at his wasted money on CG