Why regressives don’t investigate regression | Perception Matters

Saw someone ask why the ongoing illegal protests outside of judges homes to effect changes of ruling & promises of SCOTUS riots if the ruling does not go as they want are not being at least investigated.

3 things about that. What they are probably doing already. Why they may not dislike what is going on. What they certainly do not want to tell us about what they are doing or is going on.

tradecraft

First, the current admin and bureaucracy won’t persecute anyway, so kinda glad they aren’t wasting time and money investigating. This also is assuming they would tell anyone if they are already ongoing investigations that were wasting time & money. Not saying spooks are involved i the entrapment sort of way they were in the Whitmer kidnapping thing for example.

However I expect enough people are watching to be able to try and prevent any actual violence like the recent person apprehended with a gun. Any genuine new investigatory efforts would likely be hampered by announcing it too. I think things like the note saying they’ll investigate parents on the school boards thing was more pandering to their base with no actual intention to investigate. but rather appease some regressive complainers in powerful teachers unions and hopefully scare some parents into backing off.

They don’t want protestors & any who support or at least claim to understand the need for some to do what they are doing, to back off at this time.

tools of the trade

Second, assuming most don’t want this to escalate, despite collectivism being inherently violent, the at home protests or cordoning off the supreme court just continues the precedent for protesting specifically Kavanaugh, set from his confirmation hearings. It was a ‘love crime’ for the greater good & shall continue to be ‘love crimes’ of the misdemeanor level. ‘Hate crimes’ get higher scrutiny and punishment than an equivalent one without hate, the inverse of less scrutiny and more forgiveness applies to ‘love crimes.’ Added scrutiny of protests relating to Kavanaugh in particular also raise the chance of reminding people how much the Democrats & others supported the protests during that hearing.

Currently memory of the hearing is mostly how “brave and stunning” Kamala Harris was compared to how horrible and boorish the Republicans were to skrong, black woman nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. And how patriarchy shut down a survivor of abuse just like how they are railing against Amber Heard now. Don’t want people investigating their memory of that if it can be avoided.

The threatened escalations & actions such as fire-bombings and destruction of property shall be discussed more in the next section, however they also already fall under other general crimes, that are being investigated at those various levels of the judicial system.

I don’t think they’d be as standoffish about actual firebombing or even spraying grafitti in Kavanaugh’s neighborhood or close to the Supreme court. Must prevent any actual occupation of space or things like lighting fires by the court, dont want people connecting what collectivists on the left did in in Washington State to Washington D.C.That would remind people too much of things like the weather underground. Because again, collectivist ideology relies on force to be applied. Don’t want to remind people.

terrorize until investigated as a terrorist

Lastly the regressives have set the general feeling that investigation alone implies a level of guilt. Think of how much the investigations of Trump and his associates are still considered damning. In addition look how the investigations of Hunter are waved off, not claiming he hasn’t been proven guilty yet, but instead that he does not work for the government and therefore his father is not implicated.

It’s not a lack of care or investigation but a lack of announcement that the are looking into how it is what it is. I think they already know who is involved in Jane’s Revenge & other sort of activities as others have already investigated.

The statement was sent to me through an anonymous intermediary I trust. It is hosted on a Tor site (link to follow). The statement is titled "first communique" and opens with the words, "This is not a declaration of war".https://t.co/5ZhcDHiA7A pic.twitter.com/9Y0d03mXoq
— Robert Evans (The Only Robert Evans) (@IwriteOK) May 10, 2022

This was back in May and they have escalated since then. Some of ya’ll really think the police-state that is the USA does not have people looking into this? Come on. But if you do an official investigation it’s like saying there is such a thing as left wing violence that is a threat. They don’t want to remind people at the moment that this is a typical thing they do investigate. From the Daily Caller “‘Night Of Rage’: Eerie Flyers Pop Up In DC Ahead Of Roe v. Wade Decision”:

“A letter purportedly from Jane’s Revenge and posted to The Anarchist Library says the impending decision “is an event that should inspire rage in millions of people who can get pregnant.”

“We need the state to feel our full wrath,” the letter reads. “We need them to be afraid of us.”

“Whatever form your fury takes, the first step is feeling it. The next step is carrying that anger out into the world and expressing it physically. Consider this your call to action. On the night the final ruling is issued — a specific date we cannot yet predict, but we know is arriving imminently — we are asking for courageous hearts to come out after dark.””

Ah yes, the anarchists who are against the federal government saying they should have less say on what the people in the states can choose to do. Totes anarchy as being against lawmakers that are not subject to their own laws. Not at all just mumbled up chaos covering for collectivism.

Sure this can be designed and printed by one person in their home office but the planning behind it leaves enough of a trail to be easily followed.

A friend sends this picture cc: ⁦@FBI⁩ pic.twitter.com/PaTko5pALb
— Ramesh Ponnuru (@RameshPonnuru) June 17, 2022

Different inquisition agencies had agents embedded in the Jan 6th protest, which turned riot and led to illegally breeching & entering the Capitol building. If they can afford to embed people in Jane’s revenge over something like this that seems to have happened this fast then why didn’t they for Jan 6th? Or things like Q which developed over years? Don’t want to remind people that the at the time head of the Proud Boys had been an informant to the inquisitors. Why have they not investigated the summer of 2020 mostly peaceful protests? Those were in neighborhoods too and if this sort of activity can effect the SCOTUS ruling how did those protests effect the judge and juries in the Chauvin vs Floyd case and many others? Were they able to get anyone inside CHAZ before or during the occupation?

Nah it is actually one of the few recently smart on their part calculations to not announce any actual investigation.

Perception matters in life and more so in politics. Shall wait and see what happens with the ruling and the REEEaction to it. Most people complaining do not know that the ruling simply kicks the decision back to state level but again, perception matters. If you get people thinking it’s “Forcing” women to be pregnant you can gin up political points. Actually most protestors involved in this are WYPIPO™… Is this the threat of whites that we have been warned about?!

Ya’ll rightfully mock the pearl clutching and worst day since pearl harbouring about grandmas walking around within the cordons hysterics on jan 6th. Look a this picture. You scared of these people? Certainly it only takes one nutter to get in with the group and cause harm, even fatal harm, but it’s vast majority performative stuff like this.