Sexual Market Value is a general concept that seems to trigger people in the already high tension topics of sexuality and economics. Stephen joins me to discuss the comments on a totally innocent and not at all bait image he posted in which someone responded to a woman’s claim that her value is not based on her sexual history.
Who decides what our value as X is? We begin this conversation by defining what we mean by SMV & economics in relation to the original post & comparison about how sexual history may be valued. We then delve into the comments the get into relationship dynamics, shaming language, personalization of the abstract & more in the attempt to understand the problems that occur from the different ways people define the same X.
youtube : odysee : bitchute : rumble
Is sexual history valuable for long term relationships?
A: Yes, must have experienced partners
B: Not as much as their sexual future
C: Depends on the kind of people & kind of sex
D: YOU’RE JUST INCELS AFRAID OF STRONG WOMEN!
E:
links of the post
- Economics definitions | Investopedia
- Economics etymology | Etyonline
- Search results for “Sexual Market Value,” be Brave and face the depth of the internets
- Search results for “Promuscuity Relatioships” from Brave.
__________
Thank you for reading. Subscribe to the Blog for more or
YouTube | Rumble | Instagram | Behance | Twitter | Substack | Minds | BitChute | Odysee
Paypal | Store
Any purchase helps support me and will almost certainly draw attention to you. What sort of attention I cannot say.
Rant A. Tonne 